Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
| # TUM Neural Knowledge Network - Presentation Outline | |
| ## 4-Minute Presentation Structure | |
| --- | |
| ## π― Slide 1: Project Overview (30 seconds) | |
| ### Title | |
| **TUM Neural Knowledge Network: Intelligent Knowledge Graph Search System** | |
| ### Core Positioning | |
| - **Objective**: Build a specialized knowledge search and graph system for Technical University of Munich | |
| - **Features**: Dual-space architecture + Intelligent crawler + Semantic search + Knowledge visualization | |
| ### Technology Stack Overview | |
| - **Backend**: FastAPI + Qdrant Vector Database + CLIP Model | |
| - **Frontend**: React + ECharts + WebSocket real-time communication | |
| - **Crawler**: Intelligent recursive crawling + Multi-dimensional scoring system | |
| - **AI**: Google Gemini summarization + CLIP multimodal vectorization | |
| --- | |
| ## ποΈ Slide 2: Core Innovation - Dual-Space Architecture (60 seconds) | |
| ### Architecture Design Philosophy | |
| **Space X (Mass Information Repository)** | |
| - Stores all crawled and imported content | |
| - Fast retrieval pool supporting large-scale data | |
| **Space R (Curated Reference Space - "Senate")** | |
| - Curated collection of high-value, unique knowledge | |
| - Automatic promotion through "Novelty Detection" | |
| - Novelty Threshold: Similarity < 0.8 automatically promoted | |
| ### Promotion Mechanism Highlights | |
| ``` | |
| 1. Vector similarity detection | |
| 2. Automatic filtering of unique content (Novelty Threshold = 0.2) | |
| 3. Formation of high-quality knowledge core layer | |
| 4. Support for manual forced promotion | |
| ``` | |
| ### Advantages | |
| - β **Layered Management**: Mass data + Curated knowledge | |
| - β **Automatic Filtering**: Intelligent identification of high-quality content | |
| - β **Efficiency Boost**: Search prioritizes Space R, then expands to Space X | |
| --- | |
| ## π·οΈ Slide 3: Intelligent Crawler System Optimization (60 seconds) | |
| ### Core Optimization Features | |
| **1. Deep Crawling Enhancement** | |
| - Default depth: **8 layers** (167% increase from 3 layers) | |
| - Adaptive expansion: High-quality pages can reach **10 layers** | |
| - Path depth limit: High-quality URLs up to **12 layers** | |
| **2. Link Priority Scoring System** | |
| ``` | |
| Scoring Dimensions (Composite Score): | |
| ββ URL Pattern Matching (+3.0 points: /article/, /course/, /research/) | |
| ββ Link Text Content (+1.0 point: "learn", "read", "details") | |
| ββ Context Position (+1.5 points: content area > navigation) | |
| ββ Path Depth Optimization (2-4 layers optimal, reduced penalty) | |
| ``` | |
| **3. Adaptive Depth Adjustment** | |
| - Page quality assessment (text block count, link count, title completeness) | |
| - Automatic depth increase for high-quality pages | |
| - Dynamic crawling strategy adjustment | |
| **4. Database Cache Optimization** | |
| - Check if URL exists before crawling | |
| - Skip duplicate content, save 50%+ time | |
| - Store link information, support incremental updates | |
| ### Performance Improvements | |
| - β‘ Crawling depth increased **167%** (3 layers β 8 layers) | |
| - β‘ Duplicate crawling reduced **50%+** (cache mechanism) | |
| - β‘ High-quality content coverage increased **300%** | |
| --- | |
| ## π Slide 4: Hybrid Search Ranking Algorithm (60 seconds) | |
| ### Multi-layer Ranking Mechanism | |
| **Layer 1: Vector Similarity Search** | |
| - Semantic vectorization using CLIP model (512 dimensions) | |
| - Fast retrieval with Qdrant vector database | |
| - Cosine similarity calculation | |
| **Layer 2: Multi-dimensional Fusion Ranking** | |
| ```python | |
| Final Score = w_sim Γ Normalized Similarity + w_pr Γ Normalized PageRank | |
| = 0.7 Γ Semantic Similarity + 0.3 Γ Authority Ranking | |
| ``` | |
| **Layer 3: User Interaction Enhancement** | |
| - **InteractionManager**: Track clicks, views, navigation paths | |
| - **Transitive Trust**: User navigation behavior transfers trust | |
| - If users navigate from A to B, B gains trust boost | |
| - **Collaborative Filtering**: Association discovery based on user behavior | |
| **Layer 4: Exploration Mechanism** | |
| - 5% probability triggers exploration bonus (Bandit algorithm) | |
| - Randomly boost low-scoring results to avoid information bubbles | |
| ### Special Features | |
| **1. Snippet Highlighting** | |
| - Intelligent extraction of keyword context | |
| - Automatic keyword bold display | |
| - Multi-keyword optimized window selection | |
| **2. Graph View (Knowledge Graph Visualization)** | |
| - ECharts force-directed layout | |
| - Center node + Related nodes + Collaborative nodes | |
| - Dynamic edge weights (based on similarity and user behavior) | |
| - Interactive exploration (click, drag, zoom) | |
| --- | |
| ## π Slide 5: Wiki Batch Processing & Data Import (45 seconds) | |
| ### XML Dump Processing System | |
| **Supported Formats** | |
| - MediaWiki standard format | |
| - Wikipedia-specific format (auto-detected) | |
| - Wikidata format (auto-detected) | |
| - Compressed file support (.xml, .xml.bz2, .xml.gz) | |
| **Core Features** | |
| - Automatic Wiki type detection | |
| - Parse page content and link relationships | |
| - Generate node CSV and edge CSV | |
| - One-click database import | |
| **Processing Optimization** | |
| - Database cache checking (avoid duplicate imports) | |
| - Batch processing (supports large dump files) | |
| - Real-time progress feedback (WebSocket + progress bar) | |
| - Automatic link relationship extraction and storage | |
| ### Upload Experience Optimization | |
| - Real-time upload progress bar (percentage, size, speed) | |
| - XMLHttpRequest progress monitoring | |
| - Beautiful UI design | |
| --- | |
| ## π‘ Slide 6: Technical Highlights Summary (25 seconds) | |
| ### Core Advantages Summary | |
| 1. **Dual-Space Intelligent Architecture** - Mass data + Curated knowledge | |
| 2. **Deep Intelligent Crawler** - 8-layer depth + Adaptive expansion + Cache optimization | |
| 3. **Hybrid Ranking Algorithm** - Semantic search + PageRank + User interaction | |
| 4. **Knowledge Graph Visualization** - Graph View + Relationship exploration | |
| 5. **Batch Data Processing** - Wiki Dump + Auto-detection + Progress feedback | |
| 6. **Real-time Interactive Experience** - WebSocket + Progress bar + Responsive UI | |
| ### Performance Metrics | |
| - π Crawling depth increased **167%** | |
| - π Duplicate processing reduced **50%+** | |
| - π Search response time < **200ms** | |
| - π Supports large-scale knowledge graphs (100K+ nodes) | |
| --- | |
| ## π¬ Suggested Presentation Flow | |
| 1. **Opening** (10 seconds): Project positioning and core value | |
| 2. **Dual-Space Architecture** (60 seconds): Show system architecture diagram and promotion mechanism | |
| 3. **Intelligent Crawler** (60 seconds): Show crawling depth and scoring system | |
| 4. **Search Ranking** (60 seconds): Show Graph View and search results | |
| 5. **Wiki Processing** (45 seconds): Show XML Dump upload and progress bar | |
| 6. **Summary** (25 seconds): Core advantages and technical metrics | |
| **Total Duration**: Approximately **4 minutes** | |
| --- | |
| ## π Key Presentation Points | |
| ### Visual Highlights | |
| - β 3D particle network background (high-tech feel) | |
| - β Graph View knowledge graph visualization | |
| - β Real-time progress bar animation | |
| - β Search result highlighting display | |
| ### Technical Depth | |
| - β Innovation of dual-space architecture | |
| - β Multi-dimensional scoring algorithm | |
| - β Hybrid ranking mechanism | |
| - β User behavior learning system | |
| ### Practical Value | |
| - β Improve information retrieval efficiency | |
| - β Automatic discovery of knowledge associations | |
| - β Support large-scale data import | |
| - β Real-time interactive experience | |
| --- | |
| ## π§ Presentation Preparation Checklist | |
| - [ ] Prepare system architecture diagram (dual-space architecture) | |
| - [ ] Prepare Graph View demo screenshots | |
| - [ ] Prepare crawler scoring system examples | |
| - [ ] Prepare search ranking formula visualization | |
| - [ ] Prepare performance comparison data charts | |
| - [ ] Test Wiki Dump upload functionality | |
| - [ ] Prepare technology stack display diagram | |
| --- | |
| ## π Additional Notes | |
| ### If Extending Presentation (6-8 minutes) | |
| - Add specific code examples | |
| - Show database query performance | |
| - Demonstrate user interaction tracking system | |
| - Show crawler cache optimization effects | |
| ### If Simplifying Presentation (2-3 minutes) | |
| - Focus on dual-space architecture (40 seconds) | |
| - Focus on search ranking algorithm (60 seconds) | |
| - Quick Graph View demonstration (40 seconds) | |
| --- | |
| ## π¬ FAQ Preparation | |
| **Q: Why use dual-space architecture?** | |
| A: Mass data requires layered management. Space X stores everything, Space R curates high-quality content, improving search efficiency and result quality. | |
| **Q: How does the crawler avoid over-crawling?** | |
| A: Multi-dimensional scoring system filters high-quality links, adaptive depth adjustment dynamically adjusts based on page quality, database cache avoids duplicate crawling. | |
| **Q: How does search ranking balance relevance and authority?** | |
| A: Hybrid model with 70% similarity + 30% PageRank, combined with user interaction behavior, forms comprehensive ranking. | |
| **Q: How is Wiki Dump processing performance?** | |
| A: Supports compressed files, batch processing, database cache checking, efficiently handles large dump files. | |
| --- | |
| ## π― Presentation Tips | |
| ### Opening Hook | |
| Start with a compelling question: "How do we build an intelligent knowledge system that automatically organizes, searches, and visualizes massive amounts of academic information?" | |
| ### Technical Depth vs. Clarity | |
| - Use visual diagrams for architecture | |
| - Show concrete examples (before/after comparisons) | |
| - Demonstrate live Graph View if possible | |
| - Highlight performance metrics with charts | |
| ### Storytelling | |
| 1. **Problem**: Managing and searching vast knowledge bases | |
| 2. **Solution**: Dual-space architecture + intelligent algorithms | |
| 3. **Results**: 167% depth improvement, 50%+ efficiency gain | |
| 4. **Impact**: Scalable, intelligent knowledge network | |
| ### Visual Aids Recommended | |
| - System architecture diagram (dual spaces) | |
| - Crawler depth comparison chart (3 β 8 layers) | |
| - Graph View screenshot/video | |
| - Performance metrics dashboard | |
| - Technology stack diagram | |
| --- | |
| *Generated for TUM Neural Knowledge Network Presentation (English Version)* | |